The Industry Standard News and Analysis for the Internet Economy
NEWS
BLOG ARCHIVES
   
        Internet News for Internet Business Sunday, 08th of November, 2009   

  BLOG ARCHIVES
Denise Howell
JD Lasica
Esme Vos
Scott Rafer
Ross Mayfield
Doc Searls
Seth Godin
Ashlee Vance
Matt McAlister
Tom Hespos
Mark Jones
Jen Muehlbauer
Cringe Worthy
Mark Frauenfelder
Declan McCullagh
Julene Snyder
Mark Glaser
Rafat Ali
Thomas Goetz
Mike Butcher
Jimmy Guterman

>> RSS Feed



  Archive

Recent Entries:
The SCO Effect
.Coms Are Back in a Little Way
Game Over for N-Gage?
TiVo Owners Under the Microscope
Police Raids Over "Piracy"


The Industry Standard: Guest Blog: Thomas Goetz



Why eBay Sucks

Michael Schrage makes a great point in a q/a on Tony Perkins' blog about eBay's quality control: that eBay's big flaw is that quality control depends on external vendors.

"If I'm eBay, why do I want to bear the costs of doing quality control for the
thousands or tens of thousands of auctions I have running at any given time
and the thousands if not tens of thousands of buyers and sellers? That's too
expensive. But I realize I need some sort of mechanism for quality control, so
I turn it over to the community. That's taking a bug and turning it into a
feature. "


Schrage is exactly right, as any of us who've been burned by an eBay auction well know. I'm going through one of these right now. In early November, I won an auction for a antique coffee table, paying $100 for the table and $50 for shipping. The seller only accepted checks & money orders. When the table arrived from UPS, it was in pieces; all four legs were snapped off. So I wrote the seller and he said 'UPS's fault; file a damage report and collect the insurance.' A pain, I thought, since it was his packaging that failed. But I dutifully filed the claim and waited. Two weeks later, called UPS and they tell me company policy is only to deal with the shipper (who pays UPS) - not the receiver. I relate this to the seller - and wait. A month goes by, I call UPS, they say they've 'closed the file,' but can't tell me what the determination of the report was. So I ask the seller. And wait. Now all this time I have held off on filing any feedback - my only recourse under eBay. But I do notice that in the meantime, another guy has posted negative feedback for the same thing - broken merchandise. But the seller then swatted back with his own negative feedback. So now I am in a quandary: the seller says he's still hassling UPS, but I have no way to determine the truth of that. And he won't respond to my requests that he just reimburse me my $100 and cash the UPS check when/if it comes. And now I've got 1 week before my window to leave feedback closes.

So I ask you: What should I do? And at what point does it make no sense for me to keep trying to get my $100 back and just do a tit/tat of negative feedback? The only thing I can say is that I'm much less a fan of eBay now - I know it's caveat emptor, but really, how much risk should a buyer take on?




Posted by thomasgoetz, February 4, 2004 07:53 PM | | TrackBack






    ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
    • Find reviews of digital cameras and download the latest graphics tools from PCWorld.
    • Astonish your colleagues with the latest technology news and trends from Computerworld.
    • Digital music that matters: chart-toppers and free audio files from Playlistmag.com.
    • Catch a daily glimpse behind the forces shaping the security business from CSOonline.com.
    • In-depth look at networking products, by Network World's team of independent reviewers.
    • Top reviews, analyses & evaluation of IT products by technology experts from InfoWorld.
    • Hot tech news with links to blogs and resources around the Internet on Lockergnome.

    MORE INTERNET NEWS LINKS


Home :: Newsletters :: RSS Feeds :: About TheStandard :: Advertise    
Copyright © 2004, TheStandard.com :: Terms and Conditions :: Privacy Policy