J.D. Lasica is a veteran journalist, blogger, and consultant who has just completed a book about the personal media revolution ("Darknet: Remixing the Future of Movies, Music & Television," Wiley & Sons, spring 2005). A leading evangelist for open media, he is currently heading up a project to create a permanent repository for grassroots video. His blogs are New Media Musings,
Darknet and Social Media.
Google News' one-sided Kerry coverage
Do news sites like Google News have any responsibility to provide balanced coverage of the presidential candiates? Do they have a responsibility to inform the public debate? You wouldn't know it by clicking on the John Kerry link under the In The News heading.
There, on the first page, dozens of links point to right-of-center blogs and sites like Useless-Knowledge.com, Men's News Daily, American Daily, Michnews.com, WorldNetDaily, LewRockwell.com, the Cato Institute, and Broken Newz, while only one link points to a left-of-center site or blog (CommonDreams.org).
Yes, politically conservative users are on the Internet in droves and point to the above sites, and that's how Google's algorithms work. But there are also a great number of usrs pointing to sites like Eschaton, Josh Marshall, the American Prospect, Daily Kos, TomPaine.com, and Alternet, all of which are MIA on Google News' first page of results.
You can see a list of the slanted news coverage here. George W. Bush, by contrast, gets even-handed treatment.
I don't mean to suggest that Google ought to return an equally balanced first page of results, but a smidgen of balance would be nice. Call it a venom correction check.
One of the most important battles over the future of Web media is taking place right now -- out of public view in Washington’s musty corridors of power.
The Federal Communications Commission is conducting a proceeding to decide whether to impose an "audio broadcast flag" on certain forms of digital radio.
This week, the Recording Industry Association of America filed a new letter with the FCC, reiterating its talking points about the “threat� posed by digital radio to terrestrial radio.
Money passage:
“Software recently introduced allows consumers to automatically search the Internet for radio stations and record songs as MP3 files; eliminate and reduce overlap at the beginning and end of songs; play songs on a personal computer; and burn songs onto CDs. Similar technology will undoubtedly be developed and used to automatically cherry-pick DAB broadcasts for recording and retention of particular songs. … [T]he threat described in RIAA’s Comments and Reply Comments is real and imminent.�
Taking a page from Hollywood, which successfully lobbied the FCC to impose a broadcast flag for digital television beginning next July, the record industry has begun to push for a similar regime for digital radio, proposing an audio broadcast flag for inclusion in the digital radio transmissions of terrestrial AM and FM stations. Exactly what this piece of software code would do is still unclear. It would likely prevent users from sending copyrighted radio programs over the Internet. But it could also hamstring other legitimate uses by preventing a digital radio program from leaving the device on which it was recorded.
Today you can tape anything you want over the free analog radio airwaves. But that may not be true tomorrow when analog gives way to digital radio. Want to record the digital broadcast of Terry Gross’s “Fresh Air� on your PC and listen to it in your car? Want to post on your blog a snippet of the 2008 Democratic National Convention and comment on it?
Your device may tell you: I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
In the brave new world of encrypted media, backed by the force of law, fair use goes out the window, and the very purpose of copyright -- to spread ideas, promote public discourse and encourage creativity -- is gutted.
Public-interest groups such as Public Knowledge, Common Cause, the Center for Digital Democracy, Media Access Project and the Electronic Frontier Foundation are working to defeat this detestable proposal. But individuals who care about free expression and user rights in the digital age need to get involved, too, before Web radio’s future is sealed by regulatory diktat.
On Friday, Wired News ran a story about how Net publisher Adam Engst has finally stumbled on a good business model -- fast-turnaround e-books.
Naturally, every writer and independent publisher who read the article was thinking the same thing: Can I do this?
So I emailed TidBITS editor Engst (whom I met at an O'Reilly conference two years ago) for a couple of additional details about his adventures in e-books. Here's our exchange:
Q. When big media companies get into the e-book business, they inevitably load down their works with digital rights management. I know neither of us is a big fan of DRM. Do you include any form of copy protection? If not, have you encountered problems with file sharing?
Engst: We do absolutely no DRM at all, and I regularly check both the conventional Web (via a daily Google search on keywords only in our PDFs) and the file sharing services (much less frequently) and although I've now seen three instances of one of our ebooks appearing, they've either been taken down quickly (one was just a mistake - the guy put it on his iDisk to take home and forgot to remove it) or not actually been available.
However, we do things to imply that these are commercial works, such as putting a prominent price on the cover of each one. My theory is that people are less likely to copy something with an explicit price showing.
We also ask readers to share the books only as they would a paper book, as in "feel free to show it to a friend, but if they're using it sufficiently, ask them to buy their own copy."
I'm a strong believer in treating people as though they're good, honest people, and my experience is that if you do that, they'll act that way.
(On one early book, we tried turning on the PDF switch that prevents people from modifying the PDF. One guy complained, though it wasn't clear that he had any real reason to want to modify the PDF, and another guy found that it wouldn't print on his HP printer. So we turned that switch off and not only did it make the first guy happy, it solved the printing problem for the second. Since then we've avoided all the protections entirely.)
Q. Do you think this model would work for a more conventional book rather than a tech how-to book? I suspect authors without the name recognition of a Stephen King would be hard-pressed to sell even 500 copies at $5 to $10 a pop.
Engst: I definitely think it can work, but the hard part is knowing how to market such a book and where to find the audience. We're still learning about marketing ebooks, for sure, and if we didn't have TidBITS to start with, it would be very hard. But we're pretty unhappy with how traditional publishers market as well, so we and our authors are thinking a lot about how to do it better. We also share the marketing burden more with authors, since that's part of why they get 50% royalties. It shares the risk and reward more equally, so if they want higher rewards, they can help with the risk as well. :)
It's also important to think about how risk/reward ratio works. If you spend a long time writing a big book, the risk is high, which tends to push the price up. If you can reduce the size of the book (which also makes it easier to read onscreen), the risk drops, which makes it easier to sell for less and thus reduces the barrier to purchase, along with eliminating some of the comparison to paper books. In other words, an ebook shouldn't just be an electronic version of a paper book.
As a journalist who likes to hang with coders (we both share a streak of the social outlaw), a couple of months back I drove into San Francisco to attend the first-ever Technorati Developers Salon.
The highlight of the evening was when Dave Sifry projected a PowerPoint chart that blew me away: a comparison of how many people in the blogosophere linked to news sites vs. other bloggers. I wanted to publish the chart right then and there, but Technorati decided to hold back the details -- until now.
Last night the Online Journalism piece published my latest story, about why an increasing number of readers trust bloggers over mainstream journalists. The transparency of blogs is a major factor in engendering trust.
But what I really want to show you is this chart: Who has the ear of the blogosphere? The chart, which hasn't appeared anywhere else on the Web, maps out the influence of big media vs. bloggers in a visually stunning way. (If you want to drill down deeper, I posted the raw numbers here.)
You’ll find the usual suspects at the top of the heap: the New York Times, CNN, BBC News and Washington Post draw more inbound links than anyone else. But scan down a bit and you see that BoingBoing and Instapundit draw attract more links than Slate, Fox News, SFGate and Reuters (and thus generate more conversation -- the lingua franca of the Web).
Meantime, mainstream news publications like the Dallas Morning News (No. 445) and the Miami Herald (No. 81) are wayyyy down the list -- or not even on the list (the New Republic).
In the article, Technorati CEO David Sifry gets it right, I think: "The Web is not chiefly about a library or a news stand. You have to start thinking about the Web as this humongous event stream. The Web is a set of ongoing conversations that weave together into this new kind of omnipresent social fabric."
Increasingly, we’re going online to engage with others, to hang out at the virtual corner bar -- to have a conversation.
That spells bad news for media outlets that continue to lecture users rather than engage us in a true dialogue.
It seems that it’s been forever since we were promised that the Web would one day mature into a more multimedia medium -- taking us into a new realm of video and audio that jostles the senses in ways that plain-vanilla text just can’t.
Hasn’t happened yet. Most of us are still firmly rooted in version 1.0 of the Web because of bandwidth constraints and the complexity of posting video.
But recent signs suggest that the barriers are slowly falling away.
Almost unnoticed, a cadre of two dozen video bloggers has sprung to life, with some active members, like Mica Scalin, posting regularly.
A Yahoo Group formed on Memorial Day is devoted to video blogging and now has 64 members. At the Democratic convention, Boston video blogger Steve Garfield produced eight video reports in an engaging display of citizen journalism. Raven, a one-person personal broadcasting network, webcasts news and events 24/7 from Daytona Beach, Fla.
Jay Dedman of the Manhattan Neighborhood Network tells new members of the Yahoo Group that all they need is a camera, a way to get the video onto your computer, a simple editing program, a blog and a fast Internet connection.
That’s still a bit daunting. As Peter Van Dijck of Guide to Ease wrote Sunday:
When Mica [Scalin] goes to work or visits friends in Manhattan, she takes a small digital videocamera, and shoots video of anything that captures her attention. At night, she makes little movies and puts them on her Typepad blog. Mica is a videoblogger.
Videoblogging isn’t made easy for Mica though. After lots of practice it still takes her a while to post an entry. Most videobloggers use 3 or 4 different programs to create a post.
Still, the tools are getting easier. vBlog Central, a service out to simplify the process of posting video and audio to a blog, is rolling out version 1 of its software to a small group of alpha testers. Garfield, the Boston video blogger, tried it last week and gives it a thumbs up.
What everyone seems to agree on is this: The visual Web will not be television but a new media form that takes its shape from its Internet underpinnings. There won’t be one way of telling stories, creating short-form movies, or capturing real life.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
Find reviews of digital cameras and download the latest graphics tools from PCWorld.
Astonish your colleagues with the latest technology news and trends from Computerworld.
Digital music that matters: chart-toppers and free audio files from Playlistmag.com.
Catch a daily glimpse behind the forces shaping the security business from CSOonline.com.
In-depth look at networking products, by Network World's team of
independent reviewers.
Top reviews, analyses & evaluation of IT products by technology experts from InfoWorld.
Hot tech news with links to blogs and resources around the Internet on Lockergnome.