Home :: Newsletters :: RSS Feeds :: About Us :: Advertise     
The Industry Standard News and Analysis for the Internet Economy
NEWS
METRICS
BLOGS
JOBS
EVENTS
        Internet News for Internet Business Monday, 04th of April, 2005   

  TOPICS
Technology
Media
Money
Politics
Opinion and Blogs


  Newsletter/RSS
Sign up today for the daily email newsletter:





  BLOGS
Denise Howell
JD Lasica
Esme Vos
Scott Rafer
Ross Mayfield
Doc Searls
Seth Godin
Ashlee Vance
Matt McAlister
Tom Hespos
Mark Jones
Jen Muehlbauer
Cringe Worthy
Mark Frauenfelder
Declan McCullagh
Julene Snyder
Mark Glaser
Rafat Ali
Thomas Goetz
Mike Butcher
Jimmy Guterman

>> RSS Feed



  Archive

Recent Entries:
Few details in eBay's Shopping.com plans
Skype, VOIP handsets on show at Computex
Microsoft plans mobile e-mail push upgrade
EBay buys Shopping.com for $620 million
New .xxx domain will be reserved for porn



Previous Story: FCC's Powell reportedly plans to resign
Next Story: Ask Jeeves developing wireless search service


Grokster gets a date with the US Supreme Court
By Scarlet Pruitt

The U.S. Supreme Court has set March 29 as the date for oral arguments on whether companies providing peer-to-peer (P-to-P) file trading software should be held responsible for copyright infringement committed by users of their products.

The arguments are part of a long-playing case pitting a cadre of entertainment industry players against distributors of the Grokster and Morpheus file trading software.

The P-to-P companies have already won in district court, and declared victory again last August when the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Grokster Ltd., Morpheus distributor StreamCast Networks Inc., and a site operated by StreamCast called Musiccity.com were not liable for copyright violations by their users.

The entertainment companies, led by the Recording Industry Association of America Inc. (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), decided to appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court, saying there are seminal issues at stake.

The lower court rulings were largely based on the landmark 1984 "Sony Betamax" case between Sony Corp. and Universal City Studios Inc. In that case the Supreme Court decided that Sony was not responsible for copyright violations committed by users of its Betamax video recorders, noting that the technology had significant noninfringing uses.

Now the Supreme Court looks set to revisit many of the arguments discussed in the Sony Betamax case.The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which is helping defend StreamCast, said this week that it looks forward to the Supreme Court reaffirming the Betamax ruling. It added that like Betamax, Morpheus has substantial noninfringing users.

Grokster is also standing by the Betamax defense. In a statement posted on its Web site the company said that any change to the Betamax ruling would serve to kill a revolutionary technology in its cradle.

The Supreme Court is expected to issue an opinion on the case by the end of July, according to EFF.

Posted January 21, 2005 04:35 PM |




FREE Email Newsletter RSS Feeds
Sign up today for the
daily email newsletter:








    ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
    • Find reviews of digital cameras and download the latest graphics tools from PCWorld.
    • Astonish your colleagues with the latest technology news and trends from Computerworld.
    • Digital music that matters: chart-toppers and free audio files from Playlistmag.com.
    • Catch a daily glimpse behind the forces shaping the security business from CSOonline.com.
    • In-depth look at networking products, by Network World's team of independent reviewers.
    • Top reviews, analyses & evaluation of IT products by technology experts from InfoWorld.
    • Hot tech news with links to blogs and resources around the Internet on Lockergnome.

    MORE INTERNET NEWS LINKS


Home :: Newsletters :: RSS Feeds :: About TheStandard :: Advertise    
Copyright © 2004, TheStandard.com :: Terms and Conditions :: Privacy Policy